Nancy Schaefer was murdered and the murder was not like it was reported. It was reported as a murder-suicide committed by her distraught husband, but no actual murder investigation was ever conducted and all the rules of preserving forensic evidence at the crime scene were literally trampled upon.
Who had what to win and who had what to lose?
Nancy Schaefer knew more about abuse in the Child Protective System in Georgia than almost anyone. She probably knew more about abuse in the CPS system throughout the nation than almost anyone too.
The murder-suicide occurred approximately two weeks before she was about to go public with a new report into child trafficking and sex abuse within Georgia’s CPS, a report that named names and highlighted specific persons who would more than likely be brought down by the report. Said report never made it to the public in its entirety since Ms. Schaefer was no longer there to be able to testify to the evidence included in her report or to attest to its veracity.
Reports from her friends and family members directly contradicted reports of her husband’s alleged financial distress. It was rumored that their house was about to be foreclosed on, but those rumors failed to disclose that the Schaefers had a second house and despite any possible foreclosure, they still had a positive net worth of more than a quarter of a million dollars.
Evidence and testimonials were overwhelming on the side of the Schaefers not being distraught, not being depressed, of them being responsible family members, happy parents, loving grandparents and regular church-goers. Evidence on the other side suggesting that the husband was so distraught as to kill his wife and then himself was minimal and sketchy at best. They were married fifty-two years.
So who had what to win and what to lose?
Then, her bullet wound was to the back. His was to the chest. Not your common murder-suicide. Maybe someone shot him, she tried to run and was shot in the back.
They saw their kids and grandchildren all the time, seemed happy and at peace, went to church. It never added up.
It never added up and no one ever did a possible murder investigation. Why not?
Of course that’s a rhetorical question because maybe there was a cover-up and maybe big money was involved and people had a lot to lose if they were exposed for what they were doing.
So this is why we don’t hear much about trafficking in the United States, trafficking through CPS, trafficking at the border, etc. Big money is why. Big money is why a lot of things that should be stopped and/or undone are not stopped or even looked into in any ways that might yield real prosecutions.
Trafficking is in the top three money-makers of crimes. First is drugs. Second is counterfeiting and third is trafficking. Its monetary value is about 150 billion a year. We know for sure the cartels are involved down there on the border and it’s a real good bet CPS is involved throughout the nation. CPS kidnaps kids under the guise of taking care of them and ushers them into adoption—all for money.
Man is by nature selfish and greedy. One really has to look at where the money leads, and that’s true in almost every arena.
Beginning soon Nancy Schaefer’s report, in installments, to follow. If you Google her, you’ll see the details of her death and the theories surrounding it.
By Peter Weiss
and
