
Nancy Schaefer was murdered and the murder was not like it was reported. It was reported as a murder-suicide committed by her distraught husband, but no actual murder investigation was ever conducted and all the rules of preserving forensic evidence at the crime scene were literally trampled upon.
Who had what to win and who had what to lose?
Nancy Schaefer knew more about abuse in the Child Protective System in Georgia than almost anyone. She probably knew more about abuse in the CPS system throughout the nation than almost anyone too.
The murder-suicide occurred approximately two weeks before she was about to go public with a new report into child trafficking and sex abuse within Georgia’s CPS, a report that named names and highlighted specific persons who would more than likely be brought down by the report. Said report never made it to the public in its entirety since Ms. Schaefer was no longer there to be able to testify to the evidence included in her report or to attest to its veracity.
Reports from her friends and family members directly contradicted reports of her husband’s alleged financial distress. It was rumored that their house was about to be foreclosed on, but those rumors failed to disclose that the Schaefers had a second house and despite any possible foreclosure, they still had a positive net worth of more than a quarter of a million dollars.
Evidence and testimonials were overwhelming on the side of the Schaefers not being distraught, not being depressed, of them being responsible family members, happy parents, loving grandparents and regular church-goers. Evidence on the other side suggesting that the husband was so distraught as to kill his wife and then himself was minimal and sketchy at best. They were married fifty-two years.
So who had what to win and what to lose?
Then, her bullet wound was to the back. His was to the chest. Not your common murder-suicide. Maybe someone shot him, she tried to run and was shot in the back.
They saw their kids and grandchildren all the time, seemed happy and at peace, went to church. It never added up.
It never added up and no one ever did a possible murder investigation. Why not?
Of course that’s a rhetorical question because maybe there was a cover-up and maybe big money was involved and people had a lot to lose if they were exposed for what they were doing.
So this is why we don’t hear much about trafficking in the United States, trafficking through CPS, trafficking at the border, etc. Big money is why. Big money is why a lot of things that should be stopped and/or undone are not stopped or even looked into in any ways that might yield real prosecutions.
Trafficking is in the top three money-makers of crimes. First is drugs. Second is counterfeiting and third is trafficking. Its monetary value is about 150 billion a year. We know for sure the cartels are involved down there on the border and it’s a real good bet CPS is involved throughout the nation. CPS kidnaps kids under the guise of taking care of them and ushers them into adoption—all for money.
Man is by nature selfish and greedy. One really has to look at where the money leads, and that’s true in almost every arena.
Beginning soon Nancy Schaefer’s report, in installments, to follow. If you Google her, you’ll see the details of her death and the theories surrounding it.
By Peter Weiss
and
Coming on Amazon in a few weeks Bill Wynn, The Second Hundred, the second collection in the fiction outtakes series.

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Of course these days how one views that statement depends upon which pill one has swallowed, per The Matrix which has been mentioned here several times lately. That’s what it’s all come down to in America and just saying it is the first indication that something is very wrong here.
That something is wrong in America is quite clear. Pinpointing exactly what “it” is is not so clear and in itself this alone is a big problem. Or, it’s a second indication that something is very wrong here.
Things are generally easier though not necessarily better when the doctor can determine exactly what’s wrong with a patient because then the doctor generally has a prescribed course of action and all the patient has to do is follow the course prescribed by the doctor.
It’s a much bigger problem for a doctor and of course for the patient when what’s wrong can’t be determined. It’s the same thing as when your car is broken and the mechanic can’t find what’s wrong. Then it becomes a hunt, a kind of seek and try to find what’s wrong. In the meantime the patient or the car does not get any better, and as we all know, mechanics replace things on the search to find what’s really wrong and keep going until they find it or don’t.
We’re talking metaphor here. Uh, duh.
So two things upfront. First and foremost, the old saying is that when you point a finger at someone (you know the hand gesture) three fingers are pointing back at you. Second, be careful what you wish for because you may just get it.
That said, let’s talk about Hollywood, the movies, those actors and actresses and pop singers who think they know something just because they’ve made a lot of money in the entertainment business and have a large following on social media.
First, they work in an industry which is mostly devoid of any morality. Next, many of them make movies in which the morality is antithetical to what they profess to us poor people, their paying customers and followers. Then they go on and live their lives to please themselves disregarding what they would have us do.
So, for example, they would take away our right to bear arms, but they travel with armed bodyguards. They tell us a wall is immoral, but most of them live on fenced-in properties within gated cities. They laud socialized medicine, Medicare for all, but they have private physicians and pay up front for the best medical care money can buy.
And that’s just a few examples.
But those examples lead to some of the biggest metaphors of all, The Hunger Games trilogy and Resident Evil series of movies.
The analogy is probably crystal. In both sets of films there are the zombies and the herds of common people and there are those who live in extreme extravagance whose only goal is to control the masses while they, the extremely affluent, just live it up.
Some examples: Al Gore, Bill and Hillary, Leonardo DiCaprio, Whoopi (who said she was leaving the country if Trump got elected but is still here professing her socialist ideals while reaping our capitalist rewards), Nancy Pelosi, and yes, now, even the darling AOC who cavorts with the millionaire socialist Bernie.
Oh, enough of that for now.
So that’s the indication, overall, that something is rotten in the state of Denmark. What you think is wrong, again, depends upon the color of the pill you’ve swallowed.
It’s all a distraction, folks, Kabuki Theater meant to divide, distract and alienate while they, our leaders, collect more and more wealth.
More on this to come!
By Peter Weiss
and
Coming in a few weeks


Quite propitiously, at least for here, Jeffrey Epstein, owner of the Lolita Express mentioned in part one, has been in the news. He’s more of a side issue, as it were, since the mainstream media is only interested in going after President Trump’s Labor Secretary, Alexander Acosta.
Is that a surprise? Or is it a shocker? Is it more important for the mainstream media to get the president than it is to actually begin to deal with the issue of human trafficking?
Altogether this is a quintessential question in America today: is it more important for the Democrats and the mainstream media to bring down this president than it is for them to take care of the American people and the business of the country?
The paradigm of absolute honesty and morality calling for Acosta’s resignation is the wonderful Debbie Wasserman Schultz, you know, that scandal-ridden leader of the Democratic National Committee during the last presidential election. She’s the one who refused to turn over their computers to the FBI, effectively impeding them from investigating the Clinton e-mail scandal. She’s the one who employed that Pakistani “family” accused of stealing computer secrets.
You can’t make this stuff up. In fiction, simply put, no one would believe it.
Acosta was a major player in a deal that allowed the known pedophile, Epstein, to get off with a sentence basically, actually much more than basically, unbelievable.
“Epstein was accused in 2008 of organizing a network of underage girls to engage in sex acts at his Palm Beach waterfront mansion. Epstein also allegedly enlisted girls to recruit even more victims, some of whom would travel with him on his private jet to New York and his private island resort in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
“Under the terms of the plea deal, Epstein was convicted in state court of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution. But a Miami Herald investigation by reporter Julie K. Brown in November noted that the allegations against Epstein were originally much broader, accusing him of coercing dozens of underage girls into sex acts.
“The Herald reports it was able to identify 80 victims—many between 13-16 years of age at the time—who said Epstein had sexually abused or molested them between 2001-2006. Eight of them agreed to be interviewed by the Herald, four on video…
“…Instead of a lengthy sentence that could have resulted from the 53-page federal indictment he was facing, Epstein pleaded guilty to two prostitution charges and served 13 months in a Palm Beach county jail, where he was allowed to leave on work release for up to 12 hours a day, six days a week.
“The agreement worked out by Acosta “essentially shut down an ongoing FBI probe that had already discovered 36 victims and could have unveiled other powerful participants in Esptein’s sex crimes, the Herald reported.”
So the real thrust of all of this, today, for the Democrats and the mainstream media, Debbie Wasserman Schultz leading the charge, is to get Acosta and thereby to get Trump, Trump because he hired a guy who made such a deal in 2008.
Make no mistake about it. If Acosta was involved in such a deal, he should not be Labor Secretary. Period.
Whether or not Trump knew about it, is another issue. And whether or not Acosta broke the law is even another issue.
But the Miami Herald now identifies about eighty Epstein victims. Herein is the real story and herein is where the thrust of the media attention should be placed.
So the real cover up still goes on.
This should be about Epstein, about human trafficking, about sex trafficking and about the magnitude of the trafficking problem. But what it’s really about is getting President Trump in an unrelated-to-Trump cover up.
President Clinton rode on Epstein’s Lolita Express twenty-six times, a known fact. He didn’t use that airplane for transportation. Many, many other prominent people are listed as friends and/or associates of Epstein’s, President Trump included.
But you can bet that if Acosta and Trump were not associated, the cover-up would still be totally covered up.
And that’s the real problem.
(The link to the Miami Herald article is included above.)
By Peter Weiss
and
Coming in a few weeks


We don’t hear much about the child trafficking business in America or in the world altogether. In fact, people could get killed talking about it, trying to expose it and reporting about it. In fact people have gotten killed trying to expose it and for reporting about it.
One wonders! One would think especially the Democrats, the supposed champions of the downtrodden, would be jumping all over the human trafficking issue/problem. After all, it is the modern form of slavery and sexual exploitation.
Isn’t that what these so-called moral-elitist Democrats claim they so detest? have always detested and fought against?
But actually they’re only self-proclaimed champions and then they only advocate for something when it fits into their political interests. The story in Virginia exemplifies this clearly. Something has to fit into their political narrative in order for them to advocate for it or take umbrage against it.
The Trump-opposers, these Dems and socialists who claim they own the moral superiority, mocked the President when he reported about the human trafficking issue at the border. In their arrogant and demeaning way, wreaking of their better-than-thou, condescending attitude, they joked that the President had seen what he was talking about in a movie and was now presenting it as real.
Lions and tigers and bears, said they.
Turns out, and it’s no surprise, that the President was correct and his facts are real facts. One in three women coming toward our borders in those caravans, toward that border where they say there is no crisis, are sexually assaulted, abused or raped and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
Turns out that the trafficking issue as a crime in the modern-day world is almost every bit as big as the drug problem. Worse, the product of it, human beings, unlike drugs, is easier to ascertain and individually much more profitable. Furthermore, there are so few criminal prosecutions for trafficking that overall and in every regard it is well worth the risk to the traffickers.
So let’s get this straight. Let’s get a real understanding of the situation before actually looking deep into it.
Sexual exploitation is covered up, sometimes applauded, overlooked, apologized for, and/or generally regarded as some kind of less-than-terrible type of crime. This is so because many prominent people are somehow involved in it. Prominent people’s involvement keeps it secretive and un-discussed.
We, the tax payers, paid more than seventeen million dollars in settlements for the very secretive Congressional slush-fund. Unwittingly, we covered up our lawmakers’ sexual indiscretions.
Similarly, former President Bill Clinton took twenty-six rides on the Lolita Express owned by Jeffrey Epstein, a known pedophile. Clinton ditched his secret service people for the rides. Up there on that plane, it’s all about underage girls.
Then there’s Harvey Weinstein and Roman Polanski and about two hundred fifty other prominent people who’ve been accused of sexual misconduct (at its least) and rape (at its worst). Many of these people are media giants, major celebrities and lawmakers, so most of these prominent people go unpunished and/or relatively unscathed by their actions, actions which very often destroy their victims’ lives. Then they keep it all hush-hush.
Human trafficking and child trafficking are parts of this very secretive and relatively un-discussed issue. Trafficking as a crime, is very big business, but with all the prominent people tangentially involved in some realm of its sexual aspects, there are few prosecutions for it and it somehow remains low-priority. It has even become fodder for scoffing and ridicule, as the Democrats have now shown.
It gets much worse. Much worse.
Trafficking is inherently tied into our own child welfare system here in America. This is another reason it stays so under the radar, mostly unreported and hidden.
By Peter Weiss
and
Coming in a few weeks




