Their debate lasted for three hours. It was held on a “friendly” network, one where they were assured not to get any questions that were really tough or which would highlight any of the accomplishments the president they hate so much has achieved.
Why?
They purposefully dis-included certain of their candidates, one of which, at least, has views which do not fit in with theirs. The dis-included candidates might have challenged them even though the moderators didn’t and wouldn’t.
Why did they dis-include them?
In their other debates so far, and in this one too, there was at least one moderator who was so politically biased that they could not even pretend to be an honest “reporter.” These people were as biased toward the left as Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are said to be toward the right.
Why?
Why would they, those Despicable Democrat presidential candidates, allow this? Why would they want such a biased forum? Or, why would they not want an unbiased forum which would present the American people with all sides of the issues and the opposing positions to their policies?
What are they afraid of? Why are they so afraid to have their positions directly pitted against the opposing positions on the same issues?
Who are their fact checkers?
Why is there no mention of fact checkers?
Why is there no real accounting for what those ten candidates are saying?
So…
Was this a debate? Or was debate a misnomer for what this event was? If it was simply a Democrat forum like a round table, why wasn’t it called that? That would’ve been okay.
This event was clearly not for the American people, as they so desperately want the populace to believe. It was only for their voting base.
Why would they pretend?
They say they speak for the American people. What is their basis for such a statement? Where are the fact checkers for this statement?
Who do they actually speak for? Who do they actually represent? How much of the voting public is still undecided?
Do they, these Despicable Democrat candidates, in their fake-debate forum sponsored and run by their biased mainstream media network, part of Pravda USA, understand any of the implications of what they’re saying? Would any one of them have to live in accordance with the policies they would implement if they were elected?
Medicare for all: will they still have their Cadillac-of-Cadillacs Senate and Congressional healthcare plans?
Will they still get a full pension and their Congressional benefits after serving just one term?
Confiscation of guns: will their bodyguards have guns? Can they still have guns?
Climate change: can they still fly? fly in private planes? live in the mansions they live in (like Al Gore and now their ever-so-endeared guru, Barack Obama) with carbon footprints greater than their entire communities and/or towns each month?
Well their meat intake be rationed? Will they eat that inner tree bark they say we must begin learning to eat?
These are but a few questions, but a few wonderings based upon what they presented to us last week.
How many of them, these ten Despicable Democrat candidates, actually believe even some of what they’re saying?
Are they really willing to destroy this country simply for their hatred of Donald Trump?
