Ellen is the metaphor.
She sat with President Bush at a ballgame and got called out by the liberals, the lefties, because she was sitting with a Republican. How terrible it was to do such a thing! In their playbook (mostly the Alinsky playbook), the lefties playbook, you’re not allowed to associate with Republicans or conservatives, and are certainly not allowed to be friends with them.
No Sir!
So the lefties chastised Ellen, castigated her, called her out such that she had to defend herself for sitting with President Bush, for being friends with someone on that side.
Ellen defended herself, made a “human” statement. Yay Ellen.
And some people on the left then came out to support her.
But get this!
Those people who came out to support Ellen were themselves castigated such that, for fear of being blacklisted and losing work, they withdrew their support for Ellen by erasing and deleting their social media postings.
Ellen is the metaphor, plain and simple.
What they did to Ellen shows where those intolerant, fascist-like lefties have brought America.
While they say they are the tolerant ones who champion everyone’s rights, their rhetoric and their actions belie what they say they stand for.
If you are a Christian and you believe in God…
If you are conservative and want to speak at a university or college…
If you are a white male…
If you are conservative woman…
If you are conservative politician…
Is it necessary to complete the sentences?
But if you’re the governor, lieutenant governor or attorney general of Virginia…
Or if you are Joe Biden…
Or Bill Clinton…
Or an illegal alien…
The Despicable Democrats have no morals, no standards, no sense of decency or fairness. They claim they have the moral high road and that they speak for the American people. But here too, their actions belie their words and at best they might speak for some of the American people. The facts show they don’t speak for at least more than 60 million voting people.
Ellen is clearly the metaphor. They are with you until you go against them, and once you go against them, even if you don’t really go against them, even for something as little as sitting with a conservative, you no longer have rights, you no longer are liked, you no longer are accepted and they will do their best to destroy you.
It was Maxine Waters who told the Democrat supporters to not let any of the Trump people eat in restaurants, get gas in gas stations, etc. It was the Democrats who fixed the laws so that innocent children, male and female, can no longer be assured that their bathrooms in schools will be gender safe. It is the Democrats who put the rights of illegal aliens above those of American citizens.
As Ellen can now say that according to the Despicable Democrats you only have rights to beliefs that are in accordance with theirs. Whether she will say it or not is a different story.
It is clear that those who profess most to being the champions of human rights and our moral leaders are nothing more than full of hot air. And Ellen is the clear metaphor for what they are.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
link to article on Medical Kidnap
Imagine a day where every child born in a hospital gets ranked on whether or not their parents will be good enough parents to take care of them, and a risk score is attached to that child based on how the government views the child’s parents.
If the risk score is too low, the parents do not get to take their child home. The child is seized by the government and assigned new parents through the multi-billion dollar foster care system.
Does this sound like something terrible from a science fiction movie? Or something that might happen in other tyrannical countries where parents have little or no choice over how their children are raised?
This system is actually already in place and is already being used in many states all across the U.S.
Richard Wexler from the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform published an excellent piece last week on the topic of “Predictive Analysis” in child welfare, and how Allegheny County, which includes Pittsburgh and surrounding suburbs, is now using a system like this to label every child born in the county with a “risk score” which supposedly tells Child Protective Services how likely parents are to abuse their newborn children.
From Pittsburgh’s child welfare agency goes full Orwell:
It is perhaps the ultimate Orwellian nightmare: From the moment your child is born, the child and family are labeled with a “risk score” – a number that supposedly tells authorities how likely you are to abuse your newborn. The big government agency that slaps this invisible scarlet number on you and your newborn promises it will be used only to decide if you need extra help to raise your child, and the help will be voluntary.
But once you’re in the database, that score stays there forever. And if, someday, the same big government agency wants to use the score to help decide you’re too much of a risk to be allowed to keep your child, there is nothing to stop them. The scarlet number may haunt your family for generations. The fact that your child was supposedly born into a “high risk” family may be used against the child when s/he has children.
Welcome to the dystopian future of child welfare – and childbirth – in metropolitan Pittsburgh, Pa.
As we have reported in previous articles, in places where Predictive Analysis software is used for risk assessment for child abuse, poor minorities are targeted as more likely to have a high risk score.
From Wexler’s article
For a couple of years now, Allegheny County, which includes Pittsburgh and surrounding suburbs, has been using something called the Allegheny Family Screening Tool (AFST), a predictive analytics algorithm, to help decide which families should be investigated as alleged child abusers.
The algorithm is weighted heavily toward punishing parents for being poor. In her brilliant book, Automating Inequality, Prof. Virginia Eubanks calls it “poverty profiling.” In her review of Automating Inequality, Prof. Dorothy Roberts (a member of NCCPR’s Board of Directors) extends the analysis to show how predictive analytics reinforces racial bias.
County Starts “Hello Baby” Program in January 2020
According to Wexler, starting in January, 2020, the county plans to start a program it calls “Hello Baby” which will assist them in getting newborn babies into their database. To NOT have your baby included in the database, one has to “opt out,” but how to opt out is apparently not clearly defined yet.
Here’s how the county says it will work.
During some of the most chaotic hours of a family’s life, those hours in the hospital after a baby is born, when one medical professional, volunteer or other hospital-affiliated person after another is traipsing in and out of the room, the family will be handed a packet of information about the help available through “Hello Baby.” A nurse may also discuss the program with the family.
The program offers three tiers of services. Tier 1 is automatically available to everyone without having to surrender their data. That tier is simply information about help that’s already out there. Tiers two and three provide more intensive help to individual families. But to get that help you must accept having the child labeled by an algorithm as at moderate or high risk of abuse.
The program automatically assumes you have given permission for this massive invasion of family privacy – it’s the equivalent of a “default setting” on an app you may download without realizing how much data you surrender in return. (Or just think of all the data you may have given to Facebook to share at will because you didn’t find the right button among the settings.)
The “Hello Baby” document is vague about the whole opt-out process. You get one notice – in the form of a postcard mailed to your home a few days after the child is born. Along with a reminder of the benefits of “Hello Baby” somewhere on that postcard will be a notification that you must specifically opt out of being run through the database – otherwise you and your child are slapped with that risk score whether you really wanted to participate or not.
The material made available by Allegheny County does not mention how much time you have to opt out before your name is run through the database. Nor does it say anything about expunging a risk score if you choose to opt out after the county has already done it.
Can We Trust Government with “Risk” Data?
In his article Wexler points out how government officials are dancing around ethic problems and trying to assure the public that the system will be voluntary, and that they will never misuse the data.
The biggest problem with this promise, of course, is that it depends on health officials and CPS to police themselves.
As an example of how this kind of data can be misused to take children away from their parents, Wexler mentions a case in New York earlier this year where a mother had her children rated as “at risk” simply because she disclosed that during her pregnancy with twins, she used cannabis for medical purposes.
Shakira Kennedy wrote about her experiences in the New York Daily News:
I am a 28-year-old loving mother and a taxpaying citizen. I have a beautiful 7-year-old daughter in a gifted and talented program and two beautiful twin baby boys. I would do anything for my children.
Unfortunately, during my pregnancy with the twins, I suffered from extreme morning sickness and could not keep food or water down. I sought the best medical care, and my doctors told me I needed to gain weight for the health of my babies.
But the medicine they prescribed didn’t work. Nothing did, until I tried cannabis.
Making sure to tell my doctor everything, I disclosed that I smoked cannabis and it helped me eat normally. That’s when I became a victim of circumstance. When my children were born, they tested negative for marijuana. But still the hospital called ACS.
I made clear to ACS that I had to use marijuana under unique circumstances — but that I would not continue to use it. I asked to schedule a drug test to prove that it would no longer be in my system.
They made me go to court or face the loss all three of my children. Then, instead of ongoing drug-testing, I was compelled to go to an outpatient rehab program three days a week for an addiction I don’t have.
Now, I have complete strangers from ACS coming into my home and telling me what to do as a parent.
Unless I am able to win my case in Family Court and get my record sealed at a later hearing, I will be blacklisted for alleged child neglect — and unable to get any job near children until my twins turn 28. (Source.)
With a long history of CPS using whatever means they can to abduct children, Wexler has a healthy skepticism when it comes to trusting government sources who say they will never misuse risk assessment data.
County officials solemnly promise not to use the data that way – they say they’ll use it only to target help, and won’t make it a part of child abuse investigations. But even the promise has a loophole:
As the county’s “Hello Baby” overview puts it:
The County pledges that this Hello Baby analytic model will only be used to provide voluntary supportive services as described here and updated over time. [Emphasis added.]
But there is no institutional safeguard in place. There is nothing to stop the leaders of the agency that created “Hello Baby” and crave having data on every child from birth from changing their minds whenever they damn well feel like it.
When might that be? How about the first time there’s a child abuse tragedy and word leaks out that the family had been labeled “high risk” at the time of the child’s birth? That’s when the demands will come to make this information available immediately to child protective services and to use it to immediately trigger a CPS investigation – or worse.
Read the full article at the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform blog.
By Peter Weiss

Wishing family, friends and everyone of you an easy fast. It would serve us all to look deep into ourselves! G’mar Tov
Be back Thursday!
They had a commercial—you remember—with the Republicans pushing Grandma-in-a-wheelchair over the cliff. They said if you voted for Republicans you’re killing Granny.
And remember that commercial with the egg and the frying pan that fried the egg and said this is your brain/this is your brain on drugs?
Well take a good look at the media-assisted Democrats. Take a very good look. They were crazed when they produced the Grandma-In-the-Wheelchair commercial and their brains are totally fried now. Their drug is power. They’d do anything and everything for it. Anything and everything includes purposefully working to collapse and/or disable the elected government. Anything and everything means breaking the law, lying to the public, dividing to conquer, and overall, perpetrating a total scam on the American people.
They are currently wholly immersed in and fully committed to this scam. They have adopted the old “I’d rather be dead than red” attitude (from the Cold War) and are clearly in the process of killing the very America they portend to be fighting for.
And so it goes.
Sometimes it seems kind of remarkable that it has to be stated so many times, the old adage that says that when you point a finger at someone three fingers are pointing back at you. Clearly, if you look at what the Democrats have done, and it’s beginning to look, no, not like a lot like Christmas, but a lot like the Obama administration not only knew about but actually helped orchestrate the crazed attempt to delegitimize the duly elected president once they discovered that they couldn’t prevent him from being elected.
As we’re beginning to see, a good part of the reason the Democrats, wholly assisted by the Pravda USA mainstream media, are so crazed is because they are knee-deep in corrupt and illegal doings. It goes on and on and on, all through the Obama administration including things like the uranium deal to the Russians that Hillary Clinton was part and parcel of and profited from.
Remember that pants suit darling? Remember Hillary standing there on that debate stage and asking Donald Trump, her opponent, if he would accept the results of the election?
So smug! So wealthy from all the money that she and her husband, the ex-president, collected into their charity in what we now know was a pay-for-play not investigated by the FBI because the FBI was so deep into her pants suit. Well, that darling in the pants suit has, of course, not accepted the results of the election. She chips away at its legitimacy every chance she can get to speak publicly, the latest of which proclamation of hers was that election was stolen, or, not legitimate.
Her people, inclusive of her lawyer Lanny Davis (who defended Michael Cohen and served as special counsel to her husband, President Bill Clinton for several years) are infused everywhere in this campaign to delegitimize and/or unseat President Trump. It’s incest to the nth degree.
Clinton’s people are active in this to protect what they do not want made public, which is the deep-seated corruption within the Clinton machine which goes way back to their Arkansas Governor days and plods forward to theirs (and the Democrat Party’s) illicit scheme to get her elected president or ruin Trump so that he could not disclose the dirty dealings they’ve been involved in all along the way.
The Crazed-Idiot Democrats and their Pravda USA mainstream media aiders and abettors, their personal propagandists, are so very crazed now because they are only a hair’s throw away from being exposed as trying to effect the take-down of a duly elected president.
In all likelihood, when fully exposed their scheme will be one of the biggest scandals in America’s history, not to mention the crimes involved which are all the more reason for them to keep pointing their fingers without any sense of their fingers, three times over, pointing right back at them.
Run by crazed idiots, the Despicable Dems, all-in now, are cornered cats scratching out at anything and everything. And we, the American people, are nothing more than collateral damage.
