We’ll keep this one short too. For all you Democrat-dogma supporters, nah, nah, nah, boo boo on you. Only one thing left to say besides imploring you to think for yourselves independently and that is: be careful — you may just get what you ask for.
You/we all have choices. You can believe what Pravda USA mainstream media Democrat lapdogs want you to believe, or you can look at things independently for yourself. You can question, or you can accept. You can act like an ostrich and bury your heads in the sand or…
Once again, and straight out for the record…
In 1970 at the Ohio State University demonstration in which six hundred people were arrested, I was the first one. Six unidentified FBI agents were beating on a demonstrator, a small kid not more than 135 pounds soaking wet. I went to help him, they knocked me out, I came to in a paddy wagon. An undercover policeman led us through a conversation that was recorded and showed up verbatim at my trial.
Here was the offer: plead guilty to misdemeanor assault and battery on a police officer, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct and be allowed to graduate (not be expelled from the University), get sixty days in the workhouse and a two hundred fifty dollar fine. The trial would be held off until I finished up my last trimester and graduated.
Or:
Don’t plead guilty. Be re–arrested for a felony, rioting one. Go to trial almost immediately and be facing a year in the state penitentiary. Bail would go up so high I couldn’t post it and I’d be expelled, hence not graduate, upon being found guilty.
My lawyer refused to let me do anything other than take the plea deal. He said they would surely find me guilty in the political climate there at that time and that I wouldn’t last a week in the penn. What he actually said was a young boy like me, they’d kill me (literally) in the first week.
My lawyer also said that if I refused to take the deal he’d quit my case and he’d make sure that any other attorney I got made me take the deal.
So I lied. I didn’t lie about being innocent. I lied about being guilty. I said I did something I surely didn’t do.
Think independently. Look what they did to Flynn. Check out who did it, who lied about what they did and why they did both.
They are guilty. Not Flynn.
Flynn was the key to… We all know what the Democrat-dogma-people can’t/won’t say.
Two things to remember: be an independent thinker, and, you lefties, be careful because you may just get what you want and discover it’s not at all what you think it is or you thought it would be.
By Peter Weiss
We’ll keep this one short too. For all you Democrat-dogma supporters, nah, nah, nah, boo boo on you. Only one thing left to say besides imploring you to think for yourselves independently and that is: be careful — you may just get what you ask for.
You/we all have choices. You can believe what Pravda USA mainstream media Democrat lapdogs want you to believe, or you can look at things independently for yourself. You can question, or you can accept. You can act like an ostrich and bury your heads in the sand or…
Once again, and straight out for the record…
In 1970 at the Ohio State University demonstration in which six hundred people were arrested, I was the first one. Six unidentified FBI agents were beating on a demonstrator, a small kid not more than 135 pounds soaking wet. I went to help him, they knocked me out, I came to in a paddy wagon. An undercover policeman led us through a conversation that was recorded and showed up verbatim at my trial.
Here was the offer: plead guilty to misdemeanor assault and battery on a police officer, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct and be allowed to graduate (not be expelled from the University), get sixty days in the workhouse and a two hundred fifty dollar fine. The trial would be held off until I finished up my last trimester and graduated.
Or:
Don’t plead guilty. Be re–arrested for a felony, rioting one. Go to trial almost immediately and be facing a year in the state penitentiary. Bail would go up so high I couldn’t post it and I’d be expelled, hence not graduate, upon being found guilty.
My lawyer refused to let me do anything other than take the plea deal. He said they would surely find me guilty in the political climate there at that time and that I wouldn’t last a week in the penn. What he actually said was a young boy like me, they’d kill me (literally) in the first week.
My lawyer also said that if I refused to take the deal he’d quit my case and he’d make sure that any other attorney I got made me take the deal.
So I lied. I didn’t lie about being innocent. I lied about being guilty. I said I did something I surely didn’t do.
Think independently. Look what they did to Flynn. Check out who did it, who lied about what they did and why they did both.
They are guilty. Not Flynn.
Flynn was the key to… We all know what the Democrat-dogma-people can’t/won’t say.
Two things to remember: be an independent thinker, and, you lefties, be careful because you may just get what you want and discover it’s not at all what you think it is or you thought it would be.
By Peter Weiss
So you should check out the statistics on the child snatchings. I stopped calling it child protection a long time ago, almost immediately in my own case. They weren’t protecting my kids. If they were, if that had been their intention, they would have checked with the school. They would have checked with my pediatrician. They would have looked into my family, friends and neighbors. They could have done all that without ever removing my kids.
Straightforward, plain and simple, their intention, DCF, CPS, whatever you want to call them, was to kidnap my kids, to snatch my kids, to use their messed-up laws and personal immunity to snatch them away from me right before my very eyes.
And they did this. They accomplished this with no muss, no fuss and no problem. They did exactly what they set out to do from the start, from the very moment that that teacher who was a mandated reporter made the mistake of telling her supervisor that my son had a black eye and that she was concerned he’d been hit [by me]. The supervisor, who knows me, then made the mistake of telling the principal, who knows me, and the principal then made the gross mistake of calling DCF instead of me. By the way, the teacher knows me too, and they are all familiar with my son who is no stranger to the school. My son, a model student, told them repeatedly how it happened, and his friend verified it too.
So why did all this happen? The $64,000 question.
Over and over again I keep asking myself this question. But the answer is simple. It’s right out there. The teacher is a young, relatively new teacher. She is not tenured, wants to get tenure because it’s a primo school district, one that is safe and secure and mostly without incident. So, my guess, she was afraid someone would see my son and ask her if she said anything. Thus, fear of a negative thought about her on the job by someone above her caused her to report something first instead of checking it out first. So it went up the chain of command, wrongfully so, needlessly so.
DCF, DYFS,CPS came to school. They saw two perfectly healthy, happy white kids. They saw two absolutely adoptable kids, kids they knew were in high demand.
Jackpot! They hit the lottery.
No phone call home. No warning. One day I sent my son off to school and he didn’t come home. Instead, they came and snatched my daughter and I didn’t know why.
Every parent’s worst nightmare come true.
And then of course CPS does what CPS does. Most people working in that system have immunity. The caseworkers can snatch your kids, take you (me) all the way through the court system, break you (me), financially and as a person (mentally), and then, if it looks like they’re not going to get what they want, which is to legally “sell” your kids into adoption, if it looks like they can’t win their case or if they think the judge might not be too happy with what they’re doing, they can just drop the whole thing, look you straight in the eye and say “oops, my bad.”
No shame. No guilt. No “I’m sorry.” No thoughts or feelings about what they’ve put you and your kids through and the damage they’ve inflicted on everyone.
So I bet many of you are thinking no, it can’t be like that. They wouldn’t do a thing like that.
Well, it is. They do. And they do it all the time. And if you don’t believe me, take some time and do some honest checking into it. Read up about it.
By Peter Weiss
(Note: This is something I saw that I thought was interesting to consider. It has been in the news recently. It is a Daily Wire Article with the link to it directly below.)
Link to article in Daily Wire here
Jury Rules Against Texas Dad Fighting 7-Year-Old Son’s Gender Transition
By Amanda Prestigiacomo
On Monday, a jury ruled against a Texas father, Jeffrey Younger, attempting to stop his seven-year-old son from a gender transition being facilitated by Dr. Anne Georgulas, the boy’s mother and Younger’s ex-wife.
“With a consensus of 11 of the 12 jurors, the jury decided not to grant Mr. Younger Sole Managing Conservatorship over his two twin boys,” LifeSiteNews reported Monday. “They voted that the current Joint Managing Conservatorship should be replaced by a Sole Managing Conservatorship, but that Mr. Younger should not be that person.”
According to the LifeSiteNews, Georgulas has been granted authority to move forward with puberty blockers, which can cause chemical castration, and, potentially, hormones, if she so chooses.
According to reporting from The Texan, Georgulas’ lawyers Jessica Janicek and Laura Hayes said the mother does not plan on giving James hormone blockers at this time. However, “no one has stated that she (Georgulas) would not be open to using them when James begins puberty,” which would be around age 11 and a half for a boy, the report said.
Additionally, with the jury’s decision, Mr. Younger will likely be forced to “affirm” his son’s new gender identity: a girl named “Luna.”
”I want you to imagine having electronic communication with your son on FaceTime, and imagine that your ex-wife has dressed him as a drag queen to talk to you,” Younger told host Luke Macias during an episode of “The Luke Macias Show” podcast in January. “He has false eyelashes and makeup. His hair has got glitter in it. He’s wearing a dress.”
“Now imagine how you would feel seeing what I believe is actual sexual abuse — I believe this is not just emotional abuse but is the very, most fundamental form of sexual abuse, tampering with the sexual identity of a vulnerable boy,” the father continued.
As reported by The Daily Wire in November, court documents show that Younger’s son only dresses as a girl when he’s with his mother, who calls the boy by his trans name and has even enrolled James as “Luna” in school. According to Younger, however, James consistently chooses to wear boy’s clothes, “violently refuses to wear girl’s clothes at my home,” and identifies as a boy whenever he is around him.
James’ mother has accused Younger of child abuse in their divorce proceedings “for not affirming James as transgender” and is looking to strip the dad of his parental rights, reported The Federalist. Georgulas is also seeking to force Younger to foot the bill for James’ visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations, which may include “chemical castration” two years from now, when the child is just eight.
The boy, according to Younger, has already been fully “socially transitioned.”
“[James] wears a dress at her (his ex-wife’s) home; he has a new made-up name, Luna – it appears in the court filings. He goes to school; the teachers call him ‘Luna.’ He uses the girl’s bathroom at school. All of his authority figures – his mother, his teacher, the librarian at school, the police officer at school, the principal at school – tell him he’s a girl. I’m the only authority figure in his life that tells him the truth; that he’s actually a boy,” Younger noted during the podcast.
The father noted that, in his opinion, he witnessed that his wife “was only giving [James] love and affection when he was acting like a girl.” She used to lock James in his room and tell him monsters only eat boys, Younger added.
“Every. Single. Day. You have to see your son sexually abused, and you have to maintain your calm,” the Texas father continued, “because the courts are not going to be fair to you. And the only way you can survive this and get your son through this alive is to calmly allow your son to be tortured right before your eyes and outlast the opposition. That’s what it’s like.”
“They’re asking me to affirm a delusion,” he said.
By Peter Weiss
So the lawyer and I had to talk. The talk, of course, cost me money, three-quarters of an hour’s worth, or on toward three hundred dollars.
First, he told me he thought maybe we ought to see if they would offer some kind of settlement. He said I might think about copping to neglect if they would return my children.
In essence, then, we could talk about this at the next court date and if everyone were amenable, within about a month after that I could have my kids back.
But I didn’t do anything, I told him. My boy was hit with a baseball that his friend threw with competitive exuberance against one of those “return the ball” screens. Except he was distracted and missed it.
The lawyer said he knew what happened and how it happened and he said he knew I wasn’t guilty of anything. He said that sometimes we find ourselves in a position where someone else is holding all the cards and at times like that it’s usually better to fold.
What does that mean? I asked him.
It meant that they had me beat financially, that they could drag the case on for maybe eighteen months or so which would cost me a fortune and during which time they would file a permanency plan which in all likelihood would recommend the judge terminate my rights as a parent and that my children be kept in foster care until such time as they were adopted by loving, caring people who wanted them.
So my lawyer stopped the clock then, so to speak, and said he wanted to tell me a story, but that he wouldn’t charge me for his story. He had his paralegal pull out a court transcript — apparently it was one she was familiar with because she knew exactly what he was referring to and where to find it.
It was a case that had seventeen court dates. His client hadn’t done anything wrong, nothing, but they managed to make it seem as if the client was about ten shades worse than Jeffrey Dahmer.
The bottom line of the case and what was in the transcript was a simple spoken line where the DAG said to the judge that the truth didn’t matter. Straight out. She said the truth didn’t matter. She said this after my lawyer claimed that what she had presented was simply not true, that it was an outright lie, a pure fabrication and he could prove it. The DAG held to it, that the truth didn’t matter, that the only thing that mattered was the presumption, or the mere possibility that it might be true.
My lawyer went off. He told the judge that if the truth didn’t matter it could not be a serious court. He said he had presented and was again presenting truth, facts and records that showed the truth and which totally belied what the DAG was claiming.
So my lawyer looked at me when we finished reading and said that the judge peered out kind of blank-eyed, that he stared out into nowhere off beyond where they all were. Then he yawned and put his hands up in the position of “what should I say?”
He didn’t stop what was going on. He didn’t find for my lawyer at all. He just, as my lawyer told it, “looked at me kind of sheepishly, and let it all go on.”
It’s all fixed, my lawyer said. So think about making a deal. The worst that we would accept is your going on the registry, but at least you’d have your kids back.
I didn’t do anything wrong. I didn’t do anything.
So I sat there in his office and cried.
Pick up a copy of all my works here: By Peter Weiss
The lawyer asked for another $10,000 minimum. He said, and he said this with a straight face too, from what he’d seen so far in the case this one was going to cost somewhere near $100,000 or maybe more.
A hundred-thousand dollars! I sat up at night all alone in the house crying and crying and crying. On top of being all alone and not having my kids there with me, on top of all the worry of what was happening to my kids, and the fears associated with not knowing where they were and not being able to find out where they were or how they were being cared for, now I had to worry about money.
My father was no happy camper. He and my mother had worked all their lives to save for retirement. They had put away what they thought was enough money for a comfortable retirement that would be supplemented by Social Security and his pension, but such an expenditure was never figured in. When we spoke, he asked me where he was supposed to get that kind of money, if I understood what that could do to his and my mother’s retirement. He was talking about selling his house. I was talking about selling my house. Suddenly, out of the blue, we were talking about me and my kids maybe moving to where they live and all of us living together in a downsized house.
I cried even more after I hung up the phone every night with my father. CPS had messed up my life and I had done nothing wrong, nothing! I had never laid a hand on my children. I had taken care of them, not adequately, but superbly as I saw it. They never went hungry. They never went without clothes, even a big selection of clothes. They had toys. My son, a bit older, had appropriate electronics. They wanted for nothing. He played in Little League, went to Boy Scouts, they both went to the doctor any and every time it was needed.
On the fourth day in court, the fourth one I was paying for, but really the third actual day we were there before the judge, none of this seemed to matter. The judge didn’t want to hear anything. He looked at me with sleepy, disinterested eyes and saw — I can’t imagine what he saw. I simply can’t imagine what was going on in his mind, what he thought, what he truly believed.
He listened to everything they presented. They had that original doctor’s report, their doctor. We showed them our doctors’ reports, ours of course presenting the whole history of my children, a history which showed only care and concern, physicals and checkups every year, all vaccinations up-to-date, appropriate physicals for school, for Little League and Boy Scouts. All my reports showed nothing but healthy, well-taken care-of children.
I would find out later that their doctor was one who made his living from CPS. I would find out that he had a long history of testifying in cases in court on CPS’s side, and my lawyer would petition the judge saying that he was a biased witness because in over thirty cases that he had testified in, he had never once found anything other than what CPS wanted him to find. He was, as my lawyer said it, their go-to guy.
And with my kids, they went to him.
So the judge sat with his cheek on his elbow his elbow on his desk or whatever they call that thing the judge sits in front of. The bench? He dozed off a couple of times as they presented the school report from that day, the doctor’s report from that day, the nurse’s opinion that it was possible he was hit in the eye.
Hello! He was hit in the eye. But not by me. By accident.
About an hour went by. Finally the judge asked CPS to begin formalizing a plan for my children, and to submit within thirty days their recommendations in the case. He banged down the gavel and once again remanded my children, for no real reason that anyone could discern, into CPS custody.
Pick up a copy of all my published works here: By Peter Weiss
Do you really think they care? Talking about Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and Elijah Cummings and most of those Despicable Democrats from Adam Schiff on over to Jerry Nadler.
Honestly now, you think any of them care about you? Care about us?
What about these people: Whoopi Goldberg, Robert DeNiro, ALSharpton? Madonna, Cher, Taylor Swift, George Clooney?
Huh!
How about all those multi-millionaire media figures on CNN, MSNBC, NBC, etc.?
More huh!
If they cared about us… If they really cared about us… On some level things wouldn’t be the way they are.
It’s easy for them, the uber-rich liberal politicians, especially the Despicable Democrat presidential candidates, to offer us all that “free” stuff and all that garbage-talk about how we’re all equal [talking about “as citizens” here] , even the illegal aliens from all over, many of them coming here not to work in America but for the free ride, when they are clearly talking down at us from up-high.
It’s even easier for the non-politician but lefty political advocate Hollywood-types and media moguls to act as spokespeople for the Despicable Dems and in many cases act like shills for them — to wit Pravda USA, the mainstream media/social media. First, they don’t have to use and/or depend upon what they’re offering us for “free” stuff if they get elected and they don’t have to live by the laws they want you/us to follow either.
And that’s what it really is.
So an anecdote by way of example.
A couple of years ago, the state I live in, a very Democratic sanctuary state, changed its “free lunch” certification qualifications. Used to be simply if you or your child were eligible for or on Medicaid you were automatically eligible for free lunch. But the state added an income element to it. So even if you are on Medicaid, free lunch eligibility now depends upon your income.
Hello! Many low, hard-working American citizens’ children were forced off free-lunch programs throughout the state.
Why?
It was virtually impossible to find out why the certification requirements were changed, literally virtually impossible. First, because they, the liberal politicians, don’t want us to know why. Second because the liberal-biased slants used by Google and social media make a search of such issues extremely obscure and difficult. Third, because the liberal politicians and their lawyers make the laws and such certification requirements overly complex so as to obscure the real reasons for being what they are, so as to obscure what they are. Remember Obamacare? 2200 pages — they didn’t have time to read it — why?
It’s like the paper-dump. At one point, when asked for discovery in a simple case, one city’s DOE dumped twenty-six cartons of paper at the lawyers door, twenty-five and a half of which were meaningless unrelated documents duplicated multiple times.
So one politician wholly anonymously admitted that the influx of illegal aliens into the state swelled the welfare rolls so high they had to make the change. And one public school principal reluctantly said their free-lunch rolls more than doubled virtually overnight. (Two weeks after the principal admitted this, six kids were removed from their school — all illegals, all using a false address, all who lived in the next town over and wanted to attend a better school.
Get the idea?
Real hard-working American citizens just getting by got their assistance taken away, were not only forced to pay for their children to eat lunch in school , but were also forced to pay for those kids who shouldn’t be here in the first place to eat too.
So… Do you really think they care about you, about us? Do you think, if you are one of those people just getting by, they, the Despicable Dems and their uber-rich Hollywood and Pravda USA shills, “feel your pain?” Even worse, you really think they don’t already know and have not foreseen what the consequences are of their promising us free stuff?
Let’s be real. That’s why they voted themselves off Obamacare.
Pick up a copy of all my works here: By Peter Weiss
based upon a true story
I was stupid. The hearing came and there was a meeting with the lawyers right before. It was all hurried because the court was full, even at nine AM. I discovered, first thing, that if I didn’t have a lawyer, I would have had to wait all day for my case to be heard and that even meant waiting while they broke for lunch.
To say it was horrible would be such an understatement—no one can imagine.
After the meeting, my lawyer told me they had statements from the school, from my son’s teacher, the nurse and the principal. They were not there in person, of course. If they were my lawyer might have gotten a chance to question them.
They also had statements from the doctor. I would learn later that CPS took my son to one of their doctors, one they used all the time and who, by everything my lawyer would be able to find out, was one who never went against what CPS wanted, who reported every initial-visit injury as physical abuse and every subsequent visit while a child was in CPS care as either accidental or nothing at all.
I know. You don’t think this is true. You think such things don’t happen. Well they happen all the time. Everywhere. In just about every state. In just about every CPS jurisdiction. Some are much worse than others.
So I asked my lawyer if my kids were coming home after the hearing. That’s when he told me they didn’t need proof, they didn’t need just about anything. The statements did not need to be verified, not at this hearing, and in fact at this hearing we wouldn’t even have a chance to do that.
My lawyer said he would be able to make a statement. He would be able to tell the court that I had a clean record, had never been in any kind of trouble, didn’t even have an outstanding parking ticket. He would be able to tell the judge that the school had never had issue with me, had never ever even had a thought about my child being abused at home.
What my lawyer didn’t know, and what we wouldn’t find out until much later, far into the trial, was that the school report being presented was edited. My child had, in fact, told everyone exactly what happened. He told the nurse, he told his teacher and he told first the assistant principal and then the principal.
But somehow, his telling all those people, and his friend telling them too, was omitted from the paperwork CPS presented. Then, quite propitiously for them, no one was there to personally testify. Apparently that was not required, even better, not permitted at the first hearing.
And so it happened. It happened so quickly if I had blinked I would have missed it. What I did see was the judge yawn about ten times, and it seemed, but I couldn’t swear to it, as if he were actually dosing off. (He would actually fall asleep during the trial.)
He banged down the gavel. The kids were remanded to CPS custody and the next hearing was scheduled for more than a month away. CPS was told to arrange visitation for me, but they didn’t and when the second hearing came around they lied and said I wasn’t interested in seeing my kids.
Preponderance of evidence—that was the legal standard. They would argue in due time that even if what I was saying was true, I was still guilty of neglect because my child got hurt.
Pick up a copy of Bill Wynn: The Second Hundred and all my works here:
By Peter Weiss
Another Form of Blackmail: Risk Losing Children to CPS For Failing to Comply with Mandatory Vaccines
Parents Risk Losing Children to CPS in NY if They Fail to Comply with Mandatory Vaccines
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
see complete story with pictures and supplementary letters here
As we reported last week, on June 13, 2019, the New York legislature quickly pushed a bill (A2371) to repeal the religious exemption to vaccination through both the Assembly and Senate in one day with no public hearings.
The unprecedented legislative coup, which cut the citizens of New York out of participating in the law making process, culminated in the Governor of New York Andrew Cuomo immediately signing the bill into law.
See: New York Quickly Removes Religious Vaccine Exemptions with No Public Hearings
Soon after this bill passed in New York, some parents apparently received letters from their children’s school districts informing them of the new law, and that any child who previously had a religious exemption to vaccines now needed to comply and get caught up on their vaccinations.
One of these letters, from Deer Park, New York, was posted on Facebook and quickly circulated, where James Cummings, the Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Personnel Services, let parents know that failure to comply and vaccinate their children would result in being reported to Child Protective Services (CPS).
CPS workers routinely seize children from parents who do not comply with medical directives. Today, you can lose your children to CPS for simply wanting to obtain a second opinion from a different doctor for medical treatments for your children.
These children are very often taken out of their homes and put into foster care, where the vast majority of them are abused.
Foster care is a billion dollar industry employing hundreds of thousands of people, and it is the main source of the United States’ very large, and very real, problem of child sex trafficking.
We have documented these cases of “medical kidnapping” for almost 5 years now on our MedicalKidnap.com website.
It would appear that State Legislators and governors imposing strict mandatory vaccination laws have now found another pipeline of putting children into this very lucrative foster care system to access federal funds, where corruption is the norm.
Pro Vaccine Extremists Move to Squelch Any Information About Vaccines that Contradicts Their Narrative
The vaccine debate in America today is a debate where only one side is allowed to voice their opinions: the most extremist view, that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary. Dissenting opinions are not allowed (not even from doctors or attorneys), and vaccines are declared to be the only area in medicine or research where it is declared that “the science is settled.”
The vaccine extremists are represented by the pharmaceutical industry, the most powerful industry in the world today. They fund most of the corporate “mainstream” media, and their industry leaders also hold key positions in government, where many of the federal health agencies also hold patents on vaccines and profit from their sales.
In the judicial system, one cannot sue a pharmaceutical company for injuries resulting from vaccines due to a law passed in 1986 that requires everyone who is injured by vaccines, or had a child or loved one killed by vaccines, to take their case to a special government “vaccine court.”
However, due to the power of the Internet and with more people turning away from the corporate-sponsored media sources for information regarding vaccines, the tech giants that control the flow of information on the Internet are now starting to strike back and prevent anyone who wants to publish anything questioning vaccines from doing so.
These policies to stop the flow of information regarding vaccine safety and efficacy, even if the information comes from government publish sources, is a clear act of discrimination against a class of people who just want to tell the truth about vaccines.
As a result, some of the largest publishers of alternative health sources are today being attacked and silenced for one main reason: they do not comply with the extremist view of vaccines that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Pinterest was probably one of the first social media companies to start banning anyone publishing information that did not support the extremist view of vaccines.
They took down all of Health Impact News’ pins related to vaccines, and then banned our account completely:
A few days ago, Sayer Ji, owner of one of the largest alternative websites on the Internet, GreenMedInfo.com, announced to his followers that his email sending program, Mailchimp, was refusing to allow him to email his database of over 300,000 subscribers due to their views on vaccines.
And then yesterday, Dr. Joseph Mercola of Mercola.com, one of the Internet’s oldest and largest alternative health websites, informed his followers that Google completely de-listed his website from search results, apparently due to his position on vaccines.
Mike Adams, the “Health Ranger,” is another one of the oldest and largest alternative websites on the Internet, NaturalNews.com. Mike also publishes the truth about vaccines, and recently he announced to his followers that Facebook permanently banned him from posting anything on his Facebook Page that had over 2 million followers.
Medical Tyranny has arrived in the United States. If citizens do not take a stand against this tyranny, soon the medical cartel will control every aspect of our lives, and they will take away our children if we do not comply.
Pick up a copy of Bill Wynn: The Second Hundred and all my works here:
By Peter Weiss
article presented here in three parts, but see entire story here
The Department of Child Safety’s enforcement of confidentiality is peppered with exceptions — particularly when the public is paying attention.
Mary Jo Pitzl, Arizona Republic Updated 5:13 p.m. EDT May 6, 2019
(continued from part 2)
Informing the public
Informed public debate over whether a child-welfare agency is doing enough to protect children or why kids were taken from their homes can boost awareness and educate policy makers, said Martin Guggenheim, a professor at the New York University Law School and co-director of the school’s Family Defense Clinic.
“It’s one thing to protect the families from public attention; it’s another thing to protect the state from public attention,” said Guggenheim.
DCS says it can’t give details on why a given child was taken into state custody. But it does report aggregate data on the reasons for removal, categorizing them as either “abuse” or “neglect.”
But that information only tells so much.
More transparency would help lawmakers understand what policies might address the main causes for children being removed from their homes, whether it’s a lack of child care, food assistance, or drug counseling. Under the current application of confidentiality, the public doesn’t know what drives “neglect” removals.
“Neglect” is a very broad term that DCS does not define further in its reports. There’s no way for the public to know the dominant reasons for neglect, which accounts for 70 percent of the 9,300 removals last year.
Generation Justice, an advocacy group, has been pushing for release of more details on cases where substance abuse is involved in incidents that result in a child’s death or near death.
Its efforts are paying off: Legislation they championed was signed into law in April by Gov. Doug Ducey. It requires DCS to report if a child involved in a near-fatality or fatality report was exposed to alcohol or drugs and whether the report was called in by a mandatory reporter, such as a medical professional or a police officer.
Let the sun shine in?
More sunshine on how the agency and the courts operate would improve the system, said attorney Chris Phillis. She runs the Office of the Public Advocate in Maricopa County, which assigns public defenders to parents. In the past, she’s represented parents herself.
“I think parents would be treated better if more (people) were able to see what’s going on,” Phillis said. “It would help people understand where the system is broken, and how to fix it.”
Former AG Horne agrees.
The laws on privacy, he said, are “written over broadly and interpreted overly broadly” and need a legislative fix.
In his experience, Horne said, DCS doesn’t like to be challenged, and can retaliate — such as seeking court orders to not talk — if it perceives a parent or attorney has disclosed a child’s identity.
I think parents would be treated better if more (people) were able to see what’s going on. It would help people understand where the system is broken, and how to fix it.
“There’s wrongdoing I’d like to talk about, but I can’t,” he said, citing fear of backlash from the agency and its attorneys.
The agency can be quick to ask a court to order parents to not talk about their case or otherwise publicize their situation. But defense attorneys question how much that protects a child.
“I think they’re trying to hold the parents down rather than protect the child,” said attorney Brad TenBrook. He represented a couple whose child was removed.
To help out, relatives set up a GoFundMe page to help cover legal expenses, but DCS got a judge to order it shut down. The page, TenBrook said, referred to the child only by first name and did not name the parents.
“What does the state get from withdrawing information from the GoFundMe page?” he asked. “Other than stopping the parent from paying for an attorney.”
Gillespie, another defense attorney, agreed a lot of the actions she’s seen are aimed at keeping parents from talking about their DCS experiences.
While DCS says parents have a right to tell their story, Gillespie is skeptical.
”I’d like to have that in writing,” she said. She’s had clients who were afraid to speak for fear of backlash.
DCS makes it clear that anything a parent says or writes can be used in court, which has a chilling effect.
(end)
